International Journal of Humanities and Social Science

      ISSN 2220-8488 (Print), 2221-0989 (Online) 10.30845/ijhss

      Call for Papers

      The Brooklyn Research and Publishing Institute (BRPI) invites academics, scholars, researchers, and professionals from around the world to submit their manuscripts for publication in our wide range of highly esteemed peer-reviewed academic journals.

      Read more...

      Recruitment of Reviewers

      The Brooklyn Research and Publishing Institute (BRPI), a distinguished international publisher of open-access academic journals, is currently inviting qualified scholars to join its esteemed pool of peer reviewers.

      Read more...

      A Study of Thai Postgraduate Students’ Authorial Voices in Writing Research Proposals: Systemic Functional Linguistics Perspective
      Udomkrit Srinon, PhD

      Abstract
      This paper presents the analysis of the written texts produced by two Thai postgraduate students whose authorial voices are projected in their research proposals. It highlights how the students project themselves in the introductions and final parts of their proposals at the beginning of their candidature in an EIL PhD program. The study uses the SFL Appraisal framework developed by Martin and White (2005) as a tool to analyse the students? writing. Two students? texts are analysed within the particular “Engagement” system; heterogloss, which is of the larger appraisal framework. The preliminary results of the analysis indicate the students use more dialogic expansion (entertaining and attributing resources) to project their voices and positions at the beginning and ending of their writing than the contracting resources. This trend could be a result of receiving some instructions from their other previous courses or their writing background. It is argued that further development of the students? writing is needed for when they are required to counter other people?s opinions in their fields logically and effectively. However, it is suggested that if students are supervised systemically and frequently, they could develop their own ways of writing clearly when making a position or an argumentation more effectively by being concerned with the audience and the ways that they are engaged in the community discourse. The paper also suggests some pedagogical applications for the further development of effective and explicit authorial stance in academic writing.

      Full Text: PDF

      主站蜘蛛池模板: 永久看一二三四线| 国产玉足榨精视频在线观看| 紧身短裙女教师波多野| 国产精选之刘婷野战| 丰满岳乱妇在线观看中字无码| 精品久久中文字幕| 国产色诱视频在线观看| 亚洲AV无码成人精品区狼人影院| 菠萝蜜视频在线看| 国产精品美女久久久网av| 久久综合狠狠综合久久综合88| 狠狠色狠狠色合久久伊人| 国产精品一区二区久久国产| 久久亚洲精品无码gv| 欧美日韩视频在线成人| 国产在线乱子伦一区二区| 97福利视频精品第一导航 | 粗大的内捧猛烈进出视频 | 久久99精品久久久久久噜噜 | 老熟妇高潮一区二区三区| 天天看天天摸色天天综合网| 亚洲欧美成人综合久久久| 国产精品吹潮香蕉在线观看| 大肉大捧一进一出小视频| 亚欧人成精品免费观看| 绝顶高潮videos| 国产性生交xxxxx免费| √天堂资源最新版中文种子| 欧美成人一区二区三区在线视频| 国产乱人伦偷精品视频下| √最新版天堂资源网在线| 日本人视频jizz69页码| 人妻va精品va欧美va| 国产4tube在线播放| 国产色a在线观看| mhsy8888| 日韩在线视频一区二区三区| 免费精品一区二区三区在线观看 | aⅴ在线免费观看| 日韩视频免费观看| 免费国产午夜高清在线视频|